(UTS) in Sydney, Australia needed a major make-over, it called in a rock star. To boost stagnant
enrollment and rejuvenate educational engagement,
the university launched a five-year, AU$180 million
project to build a new home for its business school
in 2010. UTS hoped the one-of-a-kind building,
designed by world-renowned architect Frank Gehry,
would cultivate a more inspired environment.
“A research report once described the campus as
a ‘dingy collection of buildings from which students
fled’ when their lectures were done for the day,” says
Nigel Oliver, director of the project management
office, UTS.
Named after a prominent Chinese business leader
and philanthropist, the Dr. Chau Chak Wing Building at UTS was the flagship project in a 10-year,
AU$1 billion campus overhaul. Project managers
had to ensure that Mr. Gehry’s avant-garde vision
would mesh with the university’s ambitious requirements. The project team had to balance form and
function to create cutting-edge classrooms that
would conform to new teaching and learning methods aiming to facilitate collaboration among the
school’s 1,600 faculty and postgraduate students.
“Too often, project managers may sit back assum-
ing that an extremely high-profile architect has all
the answers and your role is just to manage the
process,” says Brian Moore, executive project man-
ager, Dr. Chau Chak Wing Building project, UTS,
Sydney, Australia. “But as a client project manager,
you should understand your organization’s require-
ments better than anyone.”
The five-year project finished on time and on
budget. But to deliver Mr. Gehry’s imaginative
design—described by media critics as a “crumpled
brown paper bag”—project managers had to think
outside the box.
“A research
report once
described
the campus
as a ‘dingy
collection
of buildings
from which
students fled’
when their
lectures were
done for the
day.”
—Nigel Oliver, University
of Technology Sydney,
Sydney, Australia
When the
University of
Technology
Sydney
Face to Face
As part of the “flipped classroom” learning model,
rooms were designed and built to foster interaction among students. In oval-shaped classrooms,
students surround the teacher and see each other’s
faces. In one theater-shaped room with tiered seating, each level has two rows of desks. This allows
the front row of students to turn to face students in
the row behind them during discussions or group
work sessions.
Mr. Moore’s project team became a go-between
to ensure Mr. Gehry’s team would incorporate the
desired learning model in the building’s design.
Before construction, classroom designs were
reviewed and revised by university user groups. The
project team relied on the user groups to “turn an
idea into built reality,” Mr. Moore says.
Project managers then had to translate changes